On 13 June, Members of the House of Lords are due to consider a ‘fatal’ motion, aimed at killing the Government’s controversial draft regulations that would lower the threshold of what constitutes ‘serious disruption’ by protestors. However, the legislation, procedures and events in Parliament are complex and confusing. This event outlined exactly what’s going on.
[Closed] 12:30pm, 9 June 2023 Online (Zoom) and hosted by Blackstone Chambers
Tom Hickman KC Barrister, Blackstone Chambers; and Professor of Public Law, UCL
Ruth Fox Director, Hansard Society
Questions can be submitted to our speakers throughout the event via the Zoom app, and we encourage you to send them through.
Earlier this year the Government attempted to lower the threshold for whether a procession or assembly is likely to cause “serious disruption” to community life via a late amendment to the Public Order Bill 2023. The amendment came about at a time of heightened concern about public protests by organisations such as Insulate Britain and Just Stop Oil.
The amendment was rejected by the House of Lords. But just weeks later the same proposal was repackaged by the Government and put to Parliament again in the form of a Statutory Instrument which cannot be amended by Parliament and generally attracts less parliamentary scrutiny than a Bill. The Minister was able to do this by using a ‘Henry VIII’ power in an Act of Parliament passed in 1986.
But the Government’s legislative manoeuvre did not pass unnoticed. A House of Lords committee, tasked with scrutinising SIs, brought the proposed regulations to the wider attention of Parliament in a critical report published on 11 May. It said it was unaware of any previous example of a Government bringing back a policy via a Statutory Instrument that had recently been rejected by Parliament during passage of a Bill. Concerned Members of the House of Lords have subsequently tabled two motions for consideration on 13 June, including one ‘fatal’ motion aimed at rejecting it outright.
Due to the implications of the SI for public protest and the constitutional controversy surrounding the Government’s legislative tactics, the forthcoming Lords debates have attracted considerable attention from campaign groups, the press and across social media. But as the conversation has grown, so has the confusion surrounding what has actually happened, and what Parliament can do about it.
Still here? Some of the legal and procedural detail is complex. If you find all of this slightly baffling, but want a firmer grasp on exactly what is going on in Parliament including how events may play out on 13 June then this event is for you. You will also have the opportunity to submit questions to our expert speakers via the Zoom app, and we encourage you to do so.
What has happened in Parliament so far surrounding the Public Order Statutory Instrument (SI)?
What’s the relationship between the Public Order Act 2023, the Public Order Act 1986 and the SI in question?
What procedures apply to the SI and what do they mean for parliamentary scrutiny?
Why is going to happen in the House of Lords on 13 June? What is being debated? What are ‘fatal’ and ‘non-fatal’ motions? And what are the possible and likely outcomes?
Why is this issue constitutionally important and what does it mean for parliamentary democracy?
The Rwanda Bill has made it over the parliamentary finishing line but not without some last-minute drama. We talk to the SNP’s Alison Thewliss MP about what went on in a small room, behind the Speaker’s Chair, away from the cameras!
To mark the Hansard Society’s 80th anniversary we are launching the Churchill-Attlee Democracy Lecture in honour of our first members, Winston Churchill and Clement Attlee. The inaugural lecture will be given by former Prime Minister the Rt Hon Theresa May MP. This is a fundraising event for our 80th Anniversary Appeal. Date & location: Tuesday 14 May 2024, 7:00-8:15pm, Westminster (venue to be announced) Tickets: £25
With a general election on the horizon there has been a spate of new legislation and regulations to implement changes to the way the election will be run, with consequences for voters and electoral administrators. Parliament has not always had a role in approving these changes. This briefing sets out the core changes to the electoral process that have been implemented since the last general election in 2019, the role that Parliament has played in scrutinising and approving them, and the risks arising from these changes.
The Climate Change Act 2008 established a framework for setting carbon budgets every five years. But the role of Parliament in approving these budgets has been widely criticised, including by the Prime Minister. The Environmental Audit Committee has proposed improvements in the scrutiny process to ensure effective climate action, particularly in the context of the UK’s commitment to achieving 'Net Zero' emissions by 2050. These reforms will significantly alter the way Parliament handles the Seventh Carbon Budget in 2025.
The Government’s flagship Tobacco and Vapes Bill will ban the sale of tobacco to anyone born after 2009. The genesis of the delegated powers in the Bill – dating back a decade - tells an important story about the way in which incomplete policy-making processes are used by Ministers to seek ‘holding’ powers in a Bill, only for that precedent to then be used to justify further, broader powers in subsequent Bills. This ‘creeping’ effect in the legislative process undermines parliamentary scrutiny of ministerial action.
