MPs debated the bill to abolish hereditary peers’ right to sit and vote in the House of Lords. But what were the opposition’s arguments? We reflect on the Government's first 100 days: is it improving legislative standards? Twenty Private Members’ Bills were announced this week: which ones may get traction? And a new Speaker’s Conference on the safety of MPs and candidates has been established. So, what is it, and what might it do?
The Government’s bill to exclude the last vestiges of the hereditary peerage from the House of Lords has cleared its Second Reading debate in the House of Commons – but should it have proposed a more ambitious reform of the Upper House?
With some MPs calling for wider changes, including several Conservatives who think the Church of England bishops should be removed alongside the hereditaries, Ruth and Mark look at the prospects for the Bill and the chances of it being amended to include other reforms. Could peers attempt to block it when it comes before them? And what does Monty Python have to do with all this?
As Labour celebrate a hundred days in office Mark fails to detect a Kennedy/Camelot vibe and Ruth warns that having squandered political capital on avoidable scandals they are also failing to keep their promise of better law-making, by pushing through 'skeleton bills' which give sweeping powers for ministers to make the law at a later date with minimal scrutiny from Parliament.
Plus, ‘assisted dying’ will be the top issue among this year’s Private Members Bills; but there are other meaty issues to chew on, like tackling climate change, requiring solar panels on new homes, regulating Airbnb-style short accommodation lets and banning mobile phones in schools.
And with MPs and election candidates menaced by violence and intimidation, what solutions might emerge from a proposed Speaker’s Conference?
Hereditary Peers Bill: what happened at Second Reading?
House of Lords reform: why are some MPs pushing for bigger changes?
The future of the Hereditary Peers Bill: will it face amendments or a block in the House of Lords?
Labour’s first 100 days: what have we learnt so far?
Labour’s legislative programme: are they delivering on promises for better law-making?
Twenty Private Members’ Bills have been introduced: what are they and how many are likely to be government-supported?
Speaker’s Conference on MP safety: what is it and why does it matter?
Hansard Society
Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There are consequently minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.
[00:00:00] You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production, supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm.
Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.
Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy. Coming up
Ruth Fox: The Tumbrils roll, as the House of Commons prepares to remove the remaining hereditary peers from the House of Lords.
Mark D'Arcy: It's not exactly been JFK, has it?
So what have we learned about this government in its first hundred days?
Ruth Fox: And MPs are under growing threat of physical violence from the public. A new Speaker's Conference is going to look at how to protect them. So what is it, and what might it do?
Mark D'Arcy: But first, Ruth, we're rather in the calm before the budget storm at the moment, waiting for Rachel. It's an [00:01:00] existential drama in which the main tax increases never appear, but the big parliamentary event that's going on even while the budget is in gestation is the bid to remove the hereditary peers, the remaining 92 of them who sit in the House of Lords, from the upper house so that they will no longer be entitled to seats in the legislature at all.
And that is a very big deal. We're talking about removing an element of Parliament that's been there since, what, the 1400s?
Both: Mm hmm.
Mark D'Arcy: And it's a major constitutional change being done in actually quite a mini piece of legislation. This is a five clause bill that quite simply removes the right of hereditary peers to sit in the Lords and doesn't attempt any wider constitutional change beyond that.
So it's both very big in one sense and quite minimalist in another...
Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.
In our latest ‘Whipping Yarn’, we talk with Simon Hart, former Conservative Chief Whip during Rishi Sunak’s Premiership. Hart opens up about his time in one of Westminster’s most demanding and discreet roles, chronicled in his new book, ‘Ungovernable: The Political Diaries of a Chief Whip’.
If a crisis or major national event occurs during a period when Parliament is adjourned, there are often demands from MPs, the media and the public for Parliament to be ‘recalled’. But the House of Commons Standing Orders stipulate that only Government Ministers - in reality, the Prime Minister - can ask the Speaker to recall the House. In recent years the House of Lords has generally been recalled at the same time as the House of Commons.
In response to the Modernisation Committee's call for views on 17 October 2024, we submitted evidence outlining key areas we believe the Committee should prioritise. Our submission recommended a focus on: strengthening legislative scrutiny, with particular emphasis on reforming the delegated legislation system; enhancing financial scrutiny, especially in relation to the Budget and the Estimates; addressing strategic gaps in parliamentary scrutiny; making more effective use of parliamentary time; and reviewing the Standing Orders, language and rituals of the House of Commons.
This briefing explains what to watch for during the Second Reading debate of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on 29 November. It outlines the procedural and legislative issues that will come into play: the role of the Chair in managing the debate and how procedures such as the 'closure' and 'reasoned amendments' work. It looks ahead to the Committee and Report stage procedures that will apply if the Bill progresses beyond Second Reading. It also examines the government's responsibilities, such as providing a money resolution for the Bill and preparing an Impact Assessment, while addressing broader concerns about the adequacy of Private Members’ Bill procedures for scrutinising controversial issues.
In this ninth instalment of our special mini-podcast series, we continue to explore the latest developments in the progress of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, often referred to as the assisted dying bill. We are joined by Dr Marie Tidball MP to discuss the amendments she has secured for a Disability Advisory Board and an independent advocate for people with learning disabilities.
