Mark and Ruth look at increasing concerns in the House of Commons that the time constraints around private members legislation could prevent Kim Leadbeater’s bill from receiving the level of debate and scrutiny the issue demands.
If MPs are perceived to have reached a decision on anything other than the merits of the Bill, the House of Commons will risk looking ridiculous. So, should the Government step in to ensure there’s enough time for consideration in the Chamber and in Committee, while remaining neutral on the merits of the policy? Or might Ministers prefer to sit on their hands?
Also, as the Government’s proposal to remove the remaining hereditary peers from the House of Lords clears the Commons, how will the denizens of the Upper House respond? The Shadow Leader of the Lords warns the “execution will be up close and personal,” with Peers having to march through the lobbies to approve the Bill, under the watchful gaze of the colleagues they will be voting to exclude.
And finally, an embarrassing blunder: the Government has discovered that it has been unlawfully charging fees for UK visa applications for years and is trying to quietly regularise its mistake. The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee is not impressed with the Home Office. It’s a painful example of the perils of delegated legislation.
Parliament
Kim Leadbeater MP, Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (012 of 2024-25 Session)
Hansard Society
Constitution Unit, UCL
D. Natzler, What future for the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill? (4 November 2024)
The Conversation
D. Gover, Assisted dying bill enters parliament – how likely is it to become law? (16 October 2024)
House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee
Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There are consequently minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.
[00:00:00] You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production, supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk/pm..
Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.
Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy. Coming up this week.
Ruth Fox: A matter of life and death. The Assisted Dying Bill has been published. It's possibly the most important private member's bill since the 1960s. So what happens next?
Mark D'Arcy: As the bill to remove hereditary peers from the House of Lords heads for a rendezvous with their lordships, the Shadow Leader of the House warns the execution will have to be done at close quarters.
Ruth Fox: And the Government has got itself in a legislative tangle over visa fees it shouldn't have charged.[00:01:00]
Mark D'Arcy: But first, Ruth, before we get into the Assisted Dying Bill, I think I should just offer a little apology. Both of us have been slightly under the weather this week. The voices are a bit croaky, the coughs come out occasionally despite our best efforts to restrain them. So listeners, please do bear with us. It's autumn in London and the viruses are about and we've both had them, so apologies in advance.
But let's talk now about the Assisted Dying Private Members Bill that's finally been published, that will be heading for debate in a couple of weeks time in the House of Commons. It's probably the most important, biggest, most controversial Private Members Bill since really the 1960s and the heroic age of Private Members Bill legislation when homosexuality was legalised, when abortion was legalised, both huge social measures that MPs were supposed to vote on their conscience for.
Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.
In this fourth instalment of our special mini-podcast series, we take you inside the Public Bill Committee as it scrutinises the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - a landmark proposal seeking to legalise assisted dying. The Committee is in full swing, debating amendments, and tensions are running high. We sit down with Sarah Olney MP, a key player in the discussions, to unpack the latest developments.
In this episode we dissect the fallout from Labour’s WhatsApp purge following the Andrew Gwynne affair and what it means for political communication at Westminster. We also explore the latest news from the House of Commons Modernisation Committee, discussing its focus on improving accessibility to Parliament, legislative scrutiny, and the debate over MPs holding second jobs.
The assisted dying bill (Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill) is now at the Committee stage, where a Public Bill Committee reviews the bill clause by clause. This briefing outlines the Committee’s role, how MPs propose changes to the bill and where these are published, how the Chair selects and groups amendments, and how these are debated and voted on.
The assisted dying bill is about to undergo detailed scrutiny by the Public Bill Committee - a group of 23 MPs tasked with reviewing the Bill’s text and proposing amendments to refine and improve it. But what exactly happens during this amendment process? Former House of Commons Clerk, Paul Evans CBE, breaks it down. Plus, we hear from Dr Ben Spencer MP, a former consultant psychiatrist turned parliamentarian, who has proposed dozens of amendments to the Bill.
Stay informed with updates and analysis on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill as it moves through Parliament. Learn about the debates, procedures, decisions, and key milestones shaping the assisted dying legislation.
