In this fourth instalment of our special mini-podcast series, we take you inside the Public Bill Committee as it scrutinises the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - a landmark proposal seeking to legalise assisted dying. The Committee is in full swing, debating amendments, and tensions are running high. We sit down with Sarah Olney MP, a key player in the discussions, to unpack the latest developments.
Sarah shares insights into her proposed amendments, the growing frustration with the legislative process, and concerns over the role of Ministers when the Government says it is neutral.
The atmosphere in the Committee has taken a combative turn, with MPs digging in on both sides of the debate. As the bill progresses slowly, controversy is brewing over judicial oversight, particularly a proposal to replace High Court judges with an expert panel - an amendment that could significantly sway support for the bill.
Olney also discusses her push for a new "test of ability" rather than "test of capacity," aiming to better safeguard vulnerable individuals. Meanwhile, questions are mounting about whether the Private Members' Bill process is the right mechanism for handling such a complex legal and ethical issue.
With so much still undecided and political divisions deepening, the bill's future hangs in the balance. Is this process up to the task, or is it exposing fundamental flaws in how Parliament legislates and its capacity to make law in this area?
Sarah Olney MP
Sarah is the Liberal Democrat MP for Richmond Park in south west London and a member of the public bill committee currently examining the assisted dying bill. She was first elected in a by-election in 2016, lost her seat in the 2017 general election, but won the seat back in 2019 and was re-elected again in 2024. Before becoming an MP, she was an accountant and since 2024 she has served on the Public Accounts Committee of the House of Commons, scrutinising Government spending.
Hansard Society
Parliament
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: Bill documents
Please note, this transcript is automatically generated. There may consequently be minor errors and the text is not formatted according to our style guide. If you wish to reference or cite the transcript copy below, please first check against the audio version above.
[00:00:00] Intro: You are listening to Parliament Matters, a Hansard Society production, supported by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Learn more at hansardsociety.org.uk.
[00:00:16] Ruth Fox: Welcome to Parliament Matters, the podcast about the institution at the heart of our democracy, Parliament itself. I'm Ruth Fox.
[00:00:23] Mark D'Arcy: And I'm Mark D'Arcy. And welcome to the fourth of our special dedicated mini pods, tracing events on the consideration in the Commons of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, the bill that will enable assisted dying.
[00:00:37] The Public Bill Committee, looking at the detail of the bill, is now in session, working through amendments, and we're going to be talking to Sarah Olney, a Lib Dem MP who's been particularly active this week putting down amendments. We've asked her what her amendments were, how they fared, and and also asked her to comment on the wider conduct of the Public Bill Committee, how things are going, how long it's going to take.
[00:01:04] Well, we're delighted to be joined by Sarah Olney, who's been one of the active members of the Public Bill Committee. And Sarah, first of all, my impression is that things are curdled a bit on the Public Bill Committee, that what may have started out as an attempt to get the mechanism right is turning into something a bit more entrenched and adversarial than perhaps people had expected.
[00:01:26] Sarah Olney MP: Hello, Mark. Yeah, well, I think that's right, actually, and it certainly has taken me a little bit by surprise. I mean, I guess my expectation was it's an issue that cuts across party lines, so while there might have been a little bit of lining up on either side of the argument, at the end of the day, it's different people from different parties. So that our party loyalty is always very strong in Parliament and certainly within the Liberal Democrats, there's a range of views. But for me personally, my colleagues on the bill committee, both of who voted yes at Second Reading, whereas I voted no. We are still very much colleagues and it's not an adversarial atmosphere between us. And I guess I kind of expected that with the other parties as well, but it has been much more adversarial than I was expecting and people very much lining up on, on either side of the argument. And I think just the voting pattern, we've not had many votes so far because we haven't made much progress, but even the votes that we have had, you can see it's a fairly fixed voting position so far. I think that might change. I think there will be other issues that come up later in the bill committee where some people will potentially switch, but currently it does seem to be quite entrenched, but also, I don't know, it is a bit more aggressive than I was expecting.
Use the links below to subscribe to the Hansard Society's Parliament Matters podcast on your preferred app, or search for 'Parliament Matters' on whichever podcasting service you use. If you are unable to find our podcast, please email us here.
In our latest ‘Whipping Yarn’, we talk with Simon Hart, former Conservative Chief Whip during Rishi Sunak’s Premiership. Hart opens up about his time in one of Westminster’s most demanding and discreet roles, chronicled in his new book, ‘Ungovernable: The Political Diaries of a Chief Whip’.
If a crisis or major national event occurs during a period when Parliament is adjourned, there are often demands from MPs, the media and the public for Parliament to be ‘recalled’. But the House of Commons Standing Orders stipulate that only Government Ministers - in reality, the Prime Minister - can ask the Speaker to recall the House. In recent years the House of Lords has generally been recalled at the same time as the House of Commons.
In response to the Modernisation Committee's call for views on 17 October 2024, we submitted evidence outlining key areas we believe the Committee should prioritise. Our submission recommended a focus on: strengthening legislative scrutiny, with particular emphasis on reforming the delegated legislation system; enhancing financial scrutiny, especially in relation to the Budget and the Estimates; addressing strategic gaps in parliamentary scrutiny; making more effective use of parliamentary time; and reviewing the Standing Orders, language and rituals of the House of Commons.
This briefing explains what to watch for during the Second Reading debate of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on 29 November. It outlines the procedural and legislative issues that will come into play: the role of the Chair in managing the debate and how procedures such as the 'closure' and 'reasoned amendments' work. It looks ahead to the Committee and Report stage procedures that will apply if the Bill progresses beyond Second Reading. It also examines the government's responsibilities, such as providing a money resolution for the Bill and preparing an Impact Assessment, while addressing broader concerns about the adequacy of Private Members’ Bill procedures for scrutinising controversial issues.
In this ninth instalment of our special mini-podcast series, we continue to explore the latest developments in the progress of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, often referred to as the assisted dying bill. We are joined by Dr Marie Tidball MP to discuss the amendments she has secured for a Disability Advisory Board and an independent advocate for people with learning disabilities.
